Showing posts with label aspen colorado. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aspen colorado. Show all posts

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Hot Deals at Auctions!

Can you get a good deal at an auction???

Depends. Take a look at this sample of the results from last Saturday's auction.

It seemed like the results were mixed. Looks like on average the auction buyers got their properties for about 20-30% lower than the asking prices. I didn't run the true comps, so you can just assume that those numbers are probably a little higher, considering that these are all bank owned properties and their condition was probably questionable:

Auction Results:

Address List Price/Sold at Auction (in 000's)

6950 Jasmine Street 79.9/ 39.5

15175 E. 51st Avenue 70/ 50

5117 Carson Street 65.9/ 44

137 Hazel 54.9/ 39

1071 S. Grove 93.5/ 95

1965 Cathay 106/ 76

9009 Ithica 99.9/ 86

6600 E. 76th 89.9/ 60

1434 Willow 90.5/ 60

4475 Eagle 104.9/ 72.5

670 S. Raritan 112.5/ 94

7975 Marion 154.9/ 103

5402 108th Place 159/ 118

201 Deer Circle 162/ 112

4885 Blackhawk 154.9/ 107.5

3508 S. Richfield 174.9/ 118

4068 Jebel 179.9/ 144

3885 Federal 190/ 147

17128 Yellow Rose 224.9/ 170

3093 Carter 314.9/ 274

25205 E. Park Crescent 350/ 287.5

17593 Euclid 460/ 387.5

3446 S. Ash 699.5/ 590







There are a few more videos I took from the auction at ColoradoDreamHomes.net.






This Blog is dedicated to Parker Colorado Real Estate and Parker Colorado Homes, Elizabeth Colorado homes and land, Franktown Colorado homes, Castle Rock real estate, and metro Denver Colorado real estate property listings. Search the Denver MLS directly for properties and homes at http://www.coloradodreamhomes.info/ and access a huge real estate resource at http://www.coloradodreamhomes.net/

Monday, January 07, 2008

Only 40 Billionaires Own Homes in Aspen!

Aspen's 2008 economic outlook: Will the rich keep spending?


Brent Gardner-Smith - Aspen Daily News Staff Writer
Print This Page Send As Email


Wed 01/02/2008 07:00AM MST

For Aspen's gold-plated economy to continue to purr along in 2008, thousands of wealthy people will need to once again decide to build or buy large expensive homes, entertain lavishly in those homes, purchase luxury goods such as jewelry and art, and continue to spend freely in the local resort marketplace.

While there are signs that some Americans may now be hesitating before making such decisions, there may be other off-setting factors, including the fact that even Aspen's real estate prices may now look like a bargain to European consumers.

Designing, approving, building, selling, buying, maintaining and using large luxury homes in Aspen, Snowmass Village and Pitkin County is the main economic engine for the Roaring Fork Valley.

And one of the leading indicators for that sector of the economy is real estate sales.

It appears as if 2007 will have produced the second largest sum of real estate sales in Pitkin County, just behind 2006.

In 2006, a record $2.4 billion worth of real estate in Pitkin County changed hands.

Through November 2007, there was $2.3 billion in real estate sales recorded, according to Land Title Guarantee Co.

And it appears as if 2008 may bring about a slight chill to the local market, which is still very robust, if not surreal.

Consider that just five years ago, the amount of annual real estate sales in Pitkin County was "only" $1.2 billion.

"We've seen a weakening in the numbers of sales and in dollar volumes compared to where we were in 2006," said Randy Gold, the president and owner of Aspen Appraisal Group Ltd., who recently completed a year-end analysis of the Aspen and Snowmass Village real estate markets. "2006 will probably remain the record year, but so what? It doesn't mean that 2007 was bad and it doesn't mean that 2008 will be bad."

What it may mean, however, is that the rapid increase in the value of local real estate may slow this year.

"Most areas of the market are going to be relatively restrained with respect to appreciation," Gold said.

Conventional wisdom among local real estate brokers is that prices for local real estate don't really ever drop much, they just stop going up as much as they were.

"If history is a guide, even if the Aspen market slows down or flattens, significant price decreases - and specifically 'deals' - will be minimal or unlikely except in rare individual circumstances," writes Tim Estin, a broker with Mason & Morse Real Estate, in what he calls The Estin Report. "If there is in fact a cooling off trend, it should be regarded as a healthy sign. A slowdown is a cyclical interval consistent with Aspen's history of rapid price appreciation followed by market lulls, but not fall-offs."

Estin notes that the external factors that could slow down the market include "credit and debt market problems (that) have led to a reduction in the availability of large mortgages, high oil prices, Iraq/Iran, stock market volatility (and) recession fears."

Philip Verlager, an economist who lives in Aspen's West End, says there are also some other international economic factors that could shape Aspen's local economy in 2008.

"The key question will be the amount of bonuses awarded to people working on Wall Street," Verlager wrote in an e-mail interview. "My guess is that the cash flow over the next year to the people working at investment banks will be down sharply. ...

"Further, the Hollywood types will have less to spend due to the writers' strike. This will put serious downward pressure on prices.

"A key factor will be the unwillingness of banks to lend. I know that many buyers pay cash. However, most cash buyers then borrow. These loans will be cut," Verlager wrote.

Brian Hazen, a broker with Coates, Reid and Waldron who sold more than $100 million in local real estate in 2007, said he has seen a change in potential buyers' attitudes over the last several months due to the downward pressure on home prices in the United States.

"If their home markets are very soft, it can't but help affect how aggressive they might want to be on purchasing second or third homes," Hazen said. "We've had a pretty soft fourth quarter, frankly. There was a loss of momentum."

But while U.S. buyers might be hesitating, some European buyers may see the Aspen market as a bargain due to the current exchange rate, where a Euro is now worth $1.45 (U.S.).

"We could see Europeans and Asians grabbing up Aspen property on the cheap," Verlager wrote.

Gold agrees.

"With the dollar being so weak, there is no question that we are a great buy for a European buyer," he said.

Another factor that could play into Aspen's economy is the growth in the number of very wealthy people in the country and Aspen's popularity with the upper-upper crust.

"Billionaires have done especially well over the past decade," writes Robert Frank, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal who writes "The Wealth Report" and who recently published "Richistan, A Journey Through the American Wealth Boom and the Lives of the New Rich." "The total wealth held by the Forbes 400 has more than doubled since 1995, from $439 billion to more than $1 trillion today."

And the demand for luxury goods - and experiences - appears to be growing.

For example, worldwide demand for champagne has been very strong in 2007.

"If a country's economy is in good shape, there is a good chance that its champagne sales are also growing," notes the Western Europe Food and Drinks Insight information service.

Champagne sales in the United States have been increasing by 10 percent a year since 2005.

And the Financial Times reported on Dec. 27 that orders for Rolls-Royce luxury automobiles are very strong and that cars coming out of the plant in West Sussex, England, were pre-sold through 2009.

Locally, Gold estimates that there are now at least 40 billionaires who own property in Aspen or Snowmass Village and that they have been changing the perception of what exceptional local properties are worth.

"These guys can afford to get whatever they want, and they do," Gold said. "Their influence is being felt at the very upper end of our market."

There were at least three local single-family homes sold for more than $20 million in 2007, including one for $36.5 million, which set a new benchmark.

As an illustration of how much money a billion dollars really is, Gold said that if a millionaire spent a dollar a second - or $3,600 an hour - their money would be gone in just over 11 days. But if a billionaire spent one of his billion dollars every second, their money would still last close to 30 years.

But even billionaires can be price sensitive.

In a Dec. 21 Wall Street Journal column entitled "Predictions for the Rich in 2008," Robert Frank said he was predicting moderation by the rich.

"Don't worry: Conspicuous consumption will continue and we'll still have plenty of oversized boats, homes, planes and parties to make fun of. Yet between the volatility in financial markets, political rhetoric about inequality, concerns about the environment and a bubble in art and collectible prices, I think we'll see a slowdown in spending and price increases at the top."

As the question of whether Aspen's gold-plated economy is bulletproof, the real threat may not come from events related to Wall Street and the global economy, but from events much closer to home.

"The great threat may not be the financial situation, unless it turns into a real disaster," said Philip Verlager. "Instead it may be the demand for labor and the difficulty of finding people to provide these services."

If a billionaire buys a home, he or she is likely to expect a high level of service, from maids to cooks to drivers to ski instructors, Verlager noted.

And if more and more of those service providers can't find their way into the country or decide that commuting through Aspen's daily traffic jam is not worth it, can the resort keep its free-spending "high-maintenance" clientele happy?

"We compete with the Vails and the St. Moritzs and many other really nice places," Verlager said. "And there are lots of towns across the world that were once the playgrounds of the rich. These people are finicky and to remain competitive, we need a really skilled work force."

bgs@aspendailynews.com

For more real estate insights, go to http://www.coloradodreamhomes.net/

Sunday, February 25, 2007

New Urbanism's flip side


Wave of renewal projects subsidized by our tax dollars without our say ultimately could slow region's growth

Denver-area residents are being bombarded with high-density living centers and the convenience of living catty-cornered to light rail in a transit-oriented development. Urban renewal authorities in each municipality from Aurora to Wheat Ridge have traditionally existed for removing blight and kick-starting the local economy but are now in the developing business, using property taxes to implement this latest planning fad.


New Urbanism is a planning concept that replaces the typical suburban single-family home with high-density, walkable communities with multifamily housing on tiny lots combining retail, office and living space. Certainly, singles and childless couples will find these areas attractive, but how many more New Urban developments can Denver's housing market handle without surpassing the saturation point of becoming Condo-rado?


Absent from the media is the explanation behind all this development. Taking a closer look, under Colorado law, urban-renewal authorities can declare almost any area "blighted" and then use eminent domain to take people's land and give it to developers. The authorities can also use tax-increment financing to capture taxes on new development. A TIF is a public incentive for redevelopment that sets aside the new project's tax revenue for a set number of years and uses it to either finance bonds or reimburse the developer's costs.


These new developments all pose added costs on fire, police, libraries, schools and other urban services. But since the taxes collected from the developments are subsidizing the projects, other residents must pay these urban-service costs, either through higher taxes or by accepting lower quality services themselves.


Urban renewal authority members are appointed by the city council. Without a vote of the people, redevelopment proposals are passed at the discretion of the city council.


For instance, Louisville's Colorado 42 corridor is getting a makeover whether the citizens like it or not. The Louisville City Council rejected, then accepted, an urban renewal development with tax-increment financing worth $77.5 million despite citizen uproar.


Subsidized development will have an unfair advantage, and the planners have won the jackpot. In this way, taxpayers have spent nearly $300 million subsidizing Stapleton, $35 million subsidizing Lowry, $45 million subsidizing Arvada City Center, $95 million subsidizing Lakewood's Belmar and $62 million subsidizing Arista in Broomfield. Urban renewal aims to stimulate growth and tax revenue to remain competitive with other cities, but ultimately, it could slow regional growth as private development will be drowned out by the influx of subsidized development.


"Subsidies breed subsidies" would be a more accurate quote than what was described in "Developers, Former Foes Grow Together," (Rocky Mountain News, 2/1 7/07), where Elise Jones is quoted as saying "Success breeds success."


The Denver Regional Council of Governments has a vision complete with 70 transit-oriented developments to be built in metro Denver, many facilitated by urban-renewal authorities. Even with the subsidies, how many more people want to live with little or no yard and with all the urban annoyances of noise, crime, etc?


Urban renewal authorities see tax-increment financing as a magic wand, and some property owners see it as an overbearing use of power. Controversy over a proposed high-density development that would replace older neighborhoods near the University of Denver light-rail station is brewing and becoming a common complaint in metro Denver.


The freedom to choose where you live is subtly being eroded by the insistence of planners with New Urbanism on the mind. Freedom to live in Colorado has been reduced to politically correct neighborhoods where suburban and exurban living and auto travel has been called ugly. Regardless of labels, what the real estate market demands is of utmost importance for success in the free market.


Socially engineering the lifestyle of Coloradans seems to be the goal of many urban-renewal planners, unfortunately at the cost of taxpayers who have no say in where their taxes go. Millions have already been poured into funding new urban renewal, and without a foreseeable market correction, planners see no end in sight to transforming Colorado with high-density development.


Jennifer Lang is a researcher for the Independence Institute's Center for the American Dream and author of "New Urban Renewal in Colorado's Front Range."

For More Housing Information go to http://www2.blogger.com/www.ColoradoDreamHomes.net

Big Time Luxuries




The World's Most Expensive Homes Boast Big Luxuries & Bigger Price Tags
Friday February 23, 2007


Last month we told you about plans to build the world's most expensive home at an exclusive club in Montana. It's value: $155 million.


But until it's actually up, there's only one place on the entire planet that can claim to beat it. It's in Surrey, England and it's called Updown Court (left). And if you have to ask how much it costs, you can't afford it.


In fact, it's hard to imagine how anyone can.


According to Forbes Magazine, which keeps track of such things, the incredible estate is the priciest place on earth. It's listed for an astounding US$138 million and has 103 rooms.
What do you get for that money? How about a 50-seat movie theatre, your own glass elevator, a 35,000 bottle wine cellar, an indoor squash court, a heated driveway that holds eight limos, several indoor spas and pools and of course, your own helicopter landing areas, in case you want to get away from the place.


But who'd want to?


It may be the penthouse when it comes to shelling out for real estate, but it's by no means an exclusive neighbourhood.


Forbes says the second most expensive home in the world belongs to Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz.


His living quarters are located in trendy Aspen, Colorado - whose climate couldn't be more different than his native Saudi Arabia.


The Starwood Estate comes with 15 bedrooms and 16 bathrooms, some stables, a tennis court, and an indoor swimming pool. It's a steal at just $135 million.


It seems only appropriate that the man who owns the third costliest domicile in the world made his fortune through real estate - and did it without an apprentice.


Donald Trump bought his Palm Beach, Florida edifice at an auction three years ago for the bargain price of $41 million. It's now worth $125 million.


It has a 100-foot swimming pool and its own ballroom, not to mention 475 feet of beach front.
And because Trump knows a thing or two about the market, it's for sale. We don't even want to think about the mortgage.


Other homes on the Top 10 list include a steel magnate's London digs worth $127 million, a Lake Tahoe, Nevada monster owned by the co-founder of the Tommy Hilfiger clothing chain ($100 million) and a waterfront estate in Istanbul, Turkey (also $100 million).


Some of the real estate comes with unique features - like a $75 million 60-acre Bridgehampton, N.Y. complex that includes its own regulation size golf course.


And then there's a place that's not technically a house at all, but more like the world's most incredible apartment.


The penthouse on top of the Pierre Hotel in New York City occupies three floors, has five master bedrooms, 7 baths, five fireplaces, what's described as the world's most elegant living room and a panoramic view of the big Apple's famed Central Park. It's yours for only $70 million.
No Canadian homes made the list, although most GTA residents would tell you our prices here are already outrageous.


But considering the amount of snow we get, that heated driveway would be a nice touch.

For More Housing Information go to http://www2.blogger.com/www.ColoradoDreamHomes.net

Sunday, January 21, 2007

A House Divided?





Give him a home in good condition priced below $300,000, and Grand Junction real estate broker Hal Heath claims he can probably sell it within a few hours.

"As soon as I make two phone calls, a sale is done," said Heath, whose greatest fear is selling a home too quickly and not getting a maximum price.

Matt Rivette, a broker with Pro Realty Inc. in Greeley, has the opposite experience.
He throws cold water in the face of home sellers unwilling to accept declining values and an extended stay on the market.

"If you want to sell a house you bought five years ago, chances are that here in Weld County it has less market value than what you paid," Rivette said.

When it comes to real estate, much more than 300 miles separates Greeley and the Front Range from the mountain destinations and Western Slope.

Large swaths of the Front Range from Fort Collins to Pueblo struggled with flat or declining median home values, according to Trulia.com, a San Francisco provider of real estate data and listings.
Home gains in Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver and Douglas counties were positive, but fell far short of covering the commission a seller would need to pay to get out of a home if they hire a real estate agent.

Median home sales prices were down 3 percent in Adams County, 3.4 percent in Larimer County, and 1.1 percent in Jefferson County, according to Trulia.com, which compared sales for September through November with the same period in 2005.

Home prices nationally have been declining as buyers cope with rising interest rates and excess supplies. The median price of existing homes sold in November was 3.1 percent lower than in November 2005, according to the National Association of Realtors.

But, it's a different picture heading west across Colorado.

In mountain resort communities, continued interest from second-home buyers drove double-digit appreciation rates. In Pitkin County, which includes Aspen, values were up 8.2 percent. In Eagle County, which includes Vail, values were up 23.9 percent.

Rising home values in Vail and Aspen have pushed workers and less wealthy residents into surrounding towns. But even bedroom communities such as Basalt and Glenwood Springs on the Western Slope are getting too pricey for some.

An influx of oil and gas workers is driving up real estate values, brokers said.

"There is a steady stream of buyers in different price ranges," said Michael Dunn, a broker with Bray & Co. in Glenwood Springs.

Anything that comes on the market under $300,000 in Gar field County gets snapped up, Dunn said. Even homes worth up to $500,000 move quickly.

Garfield County home sale appreciation was 12.5 percent, comparing the three-month period in 2006 and 2005. Mesa County, home to Grand Junction, saw a 14.2 percent spike.
The big divide in median home sale appreciation rates across the state is due in large part to higher foreclosure rates along the Front Range, according to Boulder-based mortgage banker Lou Barnes.

Anemic price gains contribute to foreclosures, making it harder for homeowners to sell. That, in turn, depresses surrounding home prices. Breaking the cycle is hard, particularly in Weld County, home to Greeley.

Last year, more homes entered foreclosure in Weld County, 2,073, than were sold, 1,870.
The backlog of unsold homes in Weld County is huge. Assuming no other homes were listed for sale, it would take 27 months to clear out the inventory of unsold homes at the current pace of sales, according to data ProRealty has collected.

Once concentrated in Weld, Adams and Arapahoe counties, foreclosures are spreading south and west.

"The guys who work foreclosures tell me that new filings in early January are just racing despite the weather," Barnes said.

Median home sales prices were down 1.1 percent in Jefferson County, west of Denver.
They were down 1.5 percent in El Paso County, home to Colorado Springs. The inventory of unsold homes rose 30 percent last year in El Paso County, according to Stuart Scott, a broker working in Colorado Springs.

Builders had to push hard to find buyers for about 1,000 speculative homes they had built or that were already under construction, said Scott.

Builders have cut back on new construction, Scott said. Permits pulled fell from 400 a month in November 2005 to around 170 in November 2006.

Staff writer Aldo Svaldi can be reached at 303-954-1410 or asvaldi@denverpost.com.

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PURSUING BUYING REAL ESTATE IN THE COLORADO MOUNTAINS OR THE WESTERN SLOPE, CONTACT US. WE HAVE PRE-SCREENED REALTORS IN EVERY COLORADO COUNTY THAT WE WOULD BE PLEASED TO REFER TO YOU. THEY ARE EXPERIENCED, HAVE EARNED NUMEROUS DESIGNATIONS, AND ARE HIGHLY REGARDED. GO TO www.ColoradoDreamHomes.net for more info.

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Aspen Mountain Gold

This is just sick...

By Jon Frankel
CNBC
Updated: 3:07 p.m. MT Oct 3, 2006


ASPEN, COLORADO - No need to fear the bursting of the housing bubble. The National Association of Realtors reports that pending home sales rose by 4.3 percent in August – a sign of stabilization. This latest barometer comes at a time when three U.S. homes are listed for more than $100 million dollars.

There is a house party in Aspen, Colorado, but you better be serious and not just curious.
“It’s like the $5 million dollar house is now $10 million and $10 million is now $20. You become used to it in a perverse way”, said Gideon Kaufman, a real estate and land use attorney. Twenty-two years ago, Nancy and Howard Gross bought their first condo for about $600,000.
“At the time we purchased, I said to my wife ‘we must be out of our minds’. The price was much more than my full-time home in Columbus, Ohio and a third of the size. We thought we were crazy. It appreciated and appreciated and appreciated”, said Howard Gross.
Today the Gross’ live in an 8,000 square foot house that they designed and built on this 15-acre lot.

“I must say I never dreamed of building or living in a home quite like this. Not only is it a special place to live but a good investment”, said Nancy Gross.

Aspen is home to priceless real estate and one of the things that is pushing the pieces is the limited amount of space to develop. It’s not unheard of for someone to come along and buy a $20 million dollar home and knock it down just to build something they really want, and in one instance a multi-million dollar home was on the market for just 12 hours.
The town’s history is silver mining, but Red Mountain is the real estate goldmine.
“I think it’s basic economics. Limited supply that is extremely regulated and our growth control becomes harder and harder, yet the demand remains constant and even increases”, said Kaufman.

Why the demand? Once a town known primarily for its skiing, Aspen in no longer just a winter playland. The summer season offers the great outdoors, as well as cultural and intellectual pursuits, which have contributed to an evolving real estate consumer.
“For some people, they experience sticker-shock when they get here, but soon they’re able to get their arms around the real value of real estate and being here in Aspen”, said Joshua Saslove, owner of Joshua & Co.

Joshua Saslove has been selling homes in Aspen for thirty years.

“This office so far in 2006 has closed $184 million dollars over 18 single-family transactions. That’s over $10 million per single family residential”, said Saslove.
Startling when, according to the National Realtors Association, less than 2% of all homes in the U.S. sell for more than a million dollars.

“In 2005, if you consider Snowmass, Aspen and Basalt, there was $2 billion worth of real estate sold. $1 billion in Aspen alone”, said B.J. Adams, owner of B.J. Adams &Co. Real Estate.
For this small town that’s a pretty big piece of the $2.3 trillion dollars in U.S. home sales last year. In Aspen this year, dollar volume is up 14%, the median sales price is up 36% and inventory is down 27%.

“The only thing that might keep us from exceeding the $2 billion mark is lack of inventory. We don’t have nearly as much to sell as we did a year ago. We have 20%-60% less inventory”, said Adams.

Which is why B.J. believes she can sell a cattle ranch sitting inside the Aspen city limits for as much as $15 million dollars.

“The value of real estate combined with the cost of construction make these numbers understandable”, said Saslove.

And what does it cost to build in Aspen?

“In 1996 when we started building $400 per foot. In 2000 it was $700-$800 per square foot. However, now in 2006, the product is selling for $1,300 - $1,500”, said Greg Hills, of Austin Lawrence Partners.

Those costs might explain why the condo market has appreciated between 20% and 60% and all the big ticket items might be fueling the run on fractional ownership at places such as the Hyatt vacation club and the St. Regis Residence Club, which is nearly sold out at prices from $300,000 to $1.5 million.

This is exactly why Nancy and Howard Gross are so happy. Remember, they bought their first condo for about $600,000, then stepped up and built their dream home? Well now it’s on the market for just under $14 million dollars.

“After living here full-time for ten years, nothing shocks me anymore”, said Nancy Gross.
“Yes, compared to something on the outskirts of Denver it seems like a lot of money, but relative to everything else around here and the prices of some of these homes, it’s on the money”, said Adams.

As always, go to http://www.ColoradoDreamHomes.net to get the best info on the DENVER METRO market...back to reality.